Pisserati . . .

...because there's so very, very much to be pissed off about!

Monday, November 07, 2011

A Tale of Two Parks

A Tale of Two Parks. On October 28, 2011, I visited NYC for the 1st time in 3 years. I walked from Penn Station to the East Village, pausing to photograph a few places I had lived in the city at different times over 11 years (152 W. 20th, 111 E. 7th, 54 E. 1st), then down Orchard and through Chinatown, finally arriving at Zuccotti Park. At the corner of Broadway and Liberty Street, I choked up and started to cry. It felt very strange to weep in public, surrounded by so much activity, so many people I didn't know, but over the few hours I spent in Zuccotti Park I broke down several times. Later in the day, near sunset, I found myself high above another park, in the living room of some very nice people (though decidedly of the 1%), who live on Central Park South. I pulled out my little video camera and went to the window to capture some juxtaposition. Somehow the 2nd movement of Beethoven’s 7th Symphony seemed to capture the mood of the day. A work in progress.

Annoyingness

People may be naturally annoying. Maybe it’s knitted into our DNA. But the tools available for us to express our annoying natures seem to be proliferating daily, from Silicone Valley and Alley, Nokia and Sony, Detroit and China, Casio and Mattel.

Lets take cell phones. Fifteen years ago they were rare. Movie stars had them. CEOs and Senators and rich people had them. They were a status symbol. But now 3rd graders have them, so that parents can track their busy comings and goings to self improvement sessions with GPS. How annoying is that entire situation? Do 3rd graders really need self-improvement? What ever happened to childhood?

Anyway, cell phones have ceased to be a status symbol. But many people don’t seem to have gotten the memo. Note the guy walking down the boardwalk giving a movie review at several bars of volume above what’s necessary to be heard on the other end. He seems to be making sure that I can hear him, even though he avoids eye contact, as if perhaps he’s on with Ebert or Roeper or Robert Redford. I want to stop him and tell him how ridiculous and annoying he is. But I don’t. Instead, I avoid eye contact too, as if I haven’t even registered his little performance, which seems to make him broadcast even louder.

Everywhere you turn there are people talking on their cell phones as if across a loud noisy room, about their boyfriends and girlfriends, shopping lists, latest vacation, latest pair of shoes, latest run-in with a difficult friend or family member, latest encounter with a turd that wouldn’t flush down the toilet properly, imagining apparently, that if your shit doesn’t sink, it’s only a matter of time until it doesn’t stink as well.

One of the worst devices available for people to practice their annoyingness skills is the automobile. It’s been around for a century now, and has always been annoying, but people keep finding clever new ways to drive others crazy with their cars, providing a neverending supply of excuses to that part of the population addicted to road rage. Fill in your own three greatest pet peeves about the annoying behavior of other drivers, and I’ll get on to some forms of annoyingness that people seem all too complacent about.

The supermarket. It’s amazing how in even the widest of aisles three separate shoppers will conspire to angle and/or abandon their carts in just the right configuration so that you can’t get by, and then you have to choose between either politely calling their attention to the situation, sighing heavily, or taking it upon yourself to push the cart out of the way with just the right degree of agitation, enough to communicate subtly that the cart’s owner is pathologically inconsiderate, ethically impaired, and morally bankrupt. Don’t they realize that we were once hunters and gatherers, and that the supermarket holds a strong primeval connection to that not-so-ancient past? Getting in the way of people obtaining their food can lead to serious problems.

Television is generally annoying, but especially when somebody else has the remote, and double especially if that person happens to have Attention Deficit Disorder. But most annoying about TV is that we now have trillions of specialized channels, none of which recognize any responsibility to broadcast content related to the name of their channel. You turn to Planet Green thinking you’ll find something about the environment, but instead find Castle Ghosts of Scotland or Extreme Cruise Ships. What? The world’s environmental problems have gotten such thorough exposure already—and are so close to being solved—that the one channel supposedly dedicated to green stuff has to dredge the bottom of the cesspool for poorly lit crap about ghosts? It’s not just annoying, it’s about 50 or 60 miles across the border into criminal.

The Science Channel has Oddities, a show about a weird antique store and Mantracker, about a guy on a horse who tracks down people on foot. The History Channel has Ice Road Truckers and shows about the future for cryin’ out loud. Shouldn’t that be on the Future Channel? It’s like quarterbacks playing on baseball teams or going into a liquor store and finding baby formula mixed in with the booze. A search of TV listings on the word philosophy only turns up a line of skin care products that has a dedicated one-hour show on each of the too-many shopping channels, and it’s on several times every day. That’s the only philosophy you’re going to find on television. Talk about annoying.

Which brings up search results. In case you haven’t noticed, search engines sell search results. That’s why whenever you search on something nowadays you get results for something different, usually a company selling a product with that keyword in it instead of the information you wanted to find. When Google started out, the thing that enabled it to corner the market on searching was that it uncannily gave you the results you were looking for in a simple and straightforward manner. It quickly replaced the library reference section for finding out information, but now Ben Franklin’s greatest invention is under corporate sponsorship. It’s as if you’ve opened the dictionary to look up the word beer and found the definition: “beer is a product made by the Coors corporation in Colorado, click here to buy some.”

Everyday it seems that some company introduces a new product that is less designed to meet an actual human need and more intended as a way to annoy neighbors, family, friends, and/or strangers. Bug zapping lights—which actually attract bugs by the way—turn a perfectly pleasant summer evening into Pol Pot’s Cambodia. All kinds of products get produced in increasingly bright fluorescent colors that seem intent on blinding you, if the new high intensity headlights on European cars don’t get you first. Boom boxes seem to be engineered so that soon they will be able to cause earthquakes. Digital cameras will soon be included on the disposable plastic knives and forks in fast food restaurants (so that you can twitter photos of what you’re having for dinner). Certain body fragrances and deodorants seem destined to get their own segment and index on the Weather Channel. Pollen count, ozone level, eau de pheromone intensity.

Just because people are annoying doesn’t mean that you have to be annoyed by them. Buddhists and self-help gurus like Eckhart Tolle claim that you can simply choose not to engage such negative things in your environment. Let it Be, as the Beatles proclaimed.

But that’s a lot easier to do with your eyes than your ears. As Laurie Anderson pointed out many years ago, the greatest design flaw of the human body is that we don’t have ear flaps the way we have eye lids. It’s impossible to block out sounds the way we can simply look away from somebody taking a piss on the sidewalk. Give me the strength to change the things I can, accept the things I can’t, and the wisdom to know the difference say the 12 steppers. But frankly, the 12 steppers themselves annoy me. The same people who for years and years were pushing me to have another drink, now implying that I might have a drinking problem myself if I order a second glass of wine.

The problem with accepting that the world is getting more annoying—for the sake of your own peace of mind—is that then there won’t be any checks and balances. Any system that has no checks and balances is guaranteed to get worse, pumping more and more annoyances into the world until the whole thing is ready to explode with bad karma.

That’s what gives rise to political parties, the most annoying thing ever invented. The world is quite a complex place, but political parties would have you believe quite the opposite. They’ve reduced it to a few easy to remember slogans, and they’re out to convince you that their cycloptic take on things is actually true. I’ll skip the examples. You know exactly what I’m talking about.

As for me, I’ll stick to being annoyed by all the crap going on, and letting people know about it when I just can’t stand it any more. It might not make much difference, but if I remain silent about it, I know for sure that the world will just keep getting more and more annoying. And if that happens, I don’t know how I’ll manage.

Friday, October 07, 2011

Real Beauty

It is perfectly natural to want to be pretty, handsome, beautiful, dashing, enticing, radiant, pleasing to the eye, in a word, attractive. It comes with being human. People are drawn to one another, and appearance often plays a significant role, so we make an effort to be attractive to each other. There's nothing new about it. It's been around since square one of evolution, not something that began with the age of advertising. It's built into our psychology, and we couldn't stop doing it even if we wanted to.

People are judges. We judge other people all the time, instantly and automatically, sometimes glowingly and sometimes damningly. When somebody new gets on a bus, or a stranger walks into a room, we judge them. Nice eyes, bad hair, a little string-beany, slightly awkward. I hope he sits next to me, or I hope she doesn't. No sense in feeling that it's right or wrong to judge others. It's something we do, and the sooner everybody cops to it, the better.

It's a private affair for the most part, a running internal commentary about everything in the world around us, not just the people we encounter. Very little of it gets spoken aloud. The root motive is not to flatter or be cruel, but to constantly assess things, including ourselves. I challenge you to get through five minutes in a public place without doing it. It just happens, and pretending that it's not happening all the time, all around us, is lying to yourself and putting your head in the sand.

Maybe you were taught as a child that it's not nice to judge others. If judging others is a reflex, however, and not a choice, then the lesson translates as: I'm not nice or none of us are nice. But if it's something we all do, better just to admit it and move on to thinking about things that we might actually be able to influence.

For example, our habit of judging, in combination with another reflex, vanity, gets exploited in our consumer-driven economy and has exploded into multi-billion dollar industries. We're all a little vain. If you've got model assets to work with, maybe vanity works well for you. Congratulations. But if your vanity far outstrips what you have to work with, somebody is probably advertising a product to prey upon your insecurities. A staggering amount of money gets spent each year on advertising, and a big chunk of that is for products that are supposed to give you better outcomes in the judgment game.

Anti-aging creams; things to make your hair thick and shiny and not grey; pills, programs and devices for weight-loss; sexy cars and push-up bras; things to make you smell better and your teeth whiter and various organs bigger or firmer or longer lasting. What's next? A surgical procedure to make your voice sexier? A dietary supplement to make your sweat tastier? For…you know…when intimacy gets around to licking. You can bet that out there somewhere they're working on how to fix some new shortcoming that you won't even realize you have until you see the ad on tv. Dingy ear lobes or fleshy ankles or elbow odor.

Every advertising agency counts on one steadfast fact: sex sells. On the surface, there doesn't seem to be anything inherently harmful about it. People want to be appealing, sexy, tempting even, and products have been created to help them do it. It's the free market, and in a free market, everybody wins, right?

Wrong. Because the advertisers don't settle for presenting their products as something that will enhance you. They are determined to create a steady drumbeat to convince you that if you do not use their product that you will be judged inadequate, or maybe even hideous and unbearable, by everybody you know or will know, or more likely will never know because you're such a lousy specimen of humankind.

Your breath is bad. Your armpits stink and are wet. Your teeth are drifting toward beige. Your cock's not big enough. Your tits sag. You have too much belly, hip, chin; not enough muscle, eye lashes, color in your cheeks; too much hair in this place and not enough somewhere else; too many wrinkles, pimples, scars, age spots, lines. You're too round, too shapeless, and too unconcerned about how you look. Your butt's not firm enough, your nose is too big, and your lips are too pale, like those of a corpse.

And it's not just about your appearance that you need to worry. You're hyperactive (don't worry, there's a pill for that), or a shrinking violet (don't worry, there's a pill for that too). You don't have enough education (get a degree online), or bookish (have a beer and loosen up). Your abdominal muscles are not rippled (a whole industry unto itself), and you are aging (the root of all evil apparently, but never fear, the cure is free, just pay shipping and handling). Everybody is too this or too that. Nobody is just right. Where the hell is Goldilocks when you need her?

The list of flaws is endless, so lets face it, there's a lot wrong with you. The only solution is to go shopping. And here's the good news, as a previous president and philosopher from Texas has pointed out, shopping is also patriotic, especially during The Depression, Part II, which it took him eight-long years to achieve before getting back to his true passion, golf.

Why not go shopping? Otherwise you're just going to sit around watching tv. And the more you watch tv, unless you DVR everything and skip through the commercials, the worse you're going to feel about yourself. Maybe you think television is your best friend, but it's not. Shopping is your best friend. All this feeling bad about yourself that the advertisers promote might make you feel that it's better to never be seen in public again, but it's time to get down to the mall. The salespeople are nice, not vicious and judgmental like the people in that reality show with all the babes and bucks. Enough of this S&M relationship with the box. Get out of the house and get a little exercise. Go buy something.

Just imagine if religions and governments berated and undermined their own people the way corporate advertisers do. Oh, wait! They do do that. So I guess it's all part of the same cloth.

Once upon a time there was an outspoken resistance to all these make you feel bad about yourself campaigns, and it was called hippies. They bought used clothes and wore them till they wore out. The women let hair grow under their arms and stopped shaving their legs. The men didn't spend hours on their abs and declared anti-perspirant deodorants to be poisonous. Their every gesture flipped Madison Avenue the bird. Okay, maybe they went a little overboard, but nowadays you hear people spitting the word hippy as if it's synonymous with Nazi. Fact is, those people had principles, even if most of them eventually gave up their principles in order to get jobs.

The advertisers, or sponsors as they're known more affectionately, are bullies. And the only way to erase a bully's power is for everybody to get together at once and declare that their tactics for making everybody afraid just aren't going to work any more. They have to be called out. We're not all Marilyn Monroe or Adonis. We fart and sweat. Aging is natural, and in some cultures it's still considered a mark of distinction and grace even, not an incurable disease that can be covered up.

Because ultimately you see, there's death, the elephant in the room that our culture is in complete denial about. There's heaven of course, but that doesn't seem to stop everybody from doing everything they can to avoid dying, and trying to cast an appearance in the meantime as if they never will. But you can't avoid dying, or aging, or for that matter, 90% of how you look. No matter how much you mutilate or inject your body. No matter how many vitamins you take. No matter how much life insurance you buy, because despite the slightly misleading name of that product, there's no escaping the grave.

So what is real beauty? Don't ask me. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. That's the best I can come up with. But that old adage has been vetoed. We've all let our flair for individual style be colonized. We've relinquished our aesthetic sovereignty to beauty dictators who don't have anybody's happiness in mind, just their own profits. Maybe it's becoming fashionable again to beat up on corporations. Why not? Since corporations are now "people" according to the Supreme Court, maybe we should start judging them as harshly as we judge each other, and ourselves. Lets send a few of these people, BP and Bank of America come to mind right away, down to Texas for an old-fashioned execution.

The world has been drifting steadily toward one big homogenized corporation-satisfying system of aesthetics. But we're not there yet, so there's lots of wiggle room, and lots of opportunity to stand up to the beauty bullies. We can all de-escalate our participation in the beauty arms race. Spend a little less on cloning ourselves to the herd. Tell our imperfectly formed friends, not only that we love them, which might mean that we value them despite how they look. Lets start telling everybody that they are beautiful, and more importantly, mean it.

Wednesday, January 26, 2011

Top Ten Films of 2010 (plus honorable mentions and a few "Are-You-Kidding-Me?"s)

My Top Ten, and Why (check back, cause it's still in flux with late releases and films that didn't get distributed to the Asbury Park hinterlands)

1. Rabbit Hole - okay, death, who wants to think about that? but this film handles emotional loss head on, not in comic book fashion or as melodrama, and it succeeds flawlessly, trusting the audience to get it; spot-on performances and storytelling.

2. Mid-August Lunch - because it is beautiful, touching, heart-warming even, and successfully challenges assumptions about the meaning of “a good time.”

3. Made in Dagenham - well, this is an insert, because I saw it after the Oscars. Just imagine, the King's Speech gets best picture, and this film didn't even get distributed in the United States. I guess it better suits the interests of American corporatism to romanticize the British monarchy (king with stutter, almost human, perfect vehicle) than to praise real-life labor movement heroes who made the world a better place for all. It's not that I'm embracing the film for it's political message, but because it's a GREAT film. And it's not that I disliked the King's Speech, but the excessive hoopla for the one and the ignoring of this magnificent film, well, it's outrageous. And Sally Hawkings is astonishing. That she got nominated for Happy Go Lucky, and not for this, well, another outrage. The Academy is a bunch of homogenized idiots.

3. The Kids Are Alright - because it pokes a stick at over-simplified notions of family and the insecurities that drive monogamy and sexual identification; and it made me laugh along the way; flawless performances from the entire cast.

4. The Social Network - because this shit really happened, and recently too, and its re-enactment is believable and compelling and entertaining; flawless directing and performances from the entire cast.

5. Another Year - as quirky as Happy-Go-Lucky and as hauntingly honest as Secrets and Lies. Life-affirming? The answer seems to be, "depends on who you are."

6. 127 Hours - because at first I thought, “I don’t want to watch that,” but then I was completely drawn in and hypnotized even; James Franco, amazing.

7. Winter’s Bone - because, again, this shit is really happening, today, down the street from you probably, and it draws you in, makes you care, with a slow, compassionate anger.

8. Undertow - not heart-wrenching, but heart-ripping. Bring a handkerchief (or two). The scene when Santiago comes and sits on the side of the sofa is seared into my brain as a cinematic tableau that belongs in the Louvre.

9. Easy A - because it pokes a stick at how “sexual exploitation” begins with the self in one of our most under-evaluated institutions, high school; and it made me laugh, uncomfortably, the whole time.

10. Nowhere Boy - a heart-tugging look at the teenage years of John Lennon; great performances, surprisingly authentic, oddly cathartic.

Honorable Mentions:

I Am Love - because it’s relentless and almost even a “feel good” movie in the end, miraculously but honestly; Tilda Swinton, amazing; you want to examine aristocracy or elites? do it like this!

The Fighter - flawlessly made, but I don’t need to see another boxing movie ever, or else it might have made my top ten; I just don’t want to be rooting for a boxer in the last reel, and I’m adamant about it.

The King’s Speech - this film falls victim somewhat to my schtick this year, that content matters; I don’t give a damn about the British monarchy, and I don’t want to be driven into empathy for one of their poor, downtrodden numbers; flawlessly directed and acted however.

Morning Glory - behind the scenes of the TV industry? yes show us more of that, less ballet and cowboys and boxers and kings, more morning anchors and what makes them tick; this is a bit of reality that affects the whole world (see Inside Job above); content matters.

Tetro - Aronofsky, take notes please; maybe Coppola will let you study as his apprentice.

Howl - Wow. Franco amazing again, bringing Ginsberg and a whole era to life.

Toy Story 3 - escapism pure and simple, fabulous entertainment, but less comic book than so many live action films this year.

City Island - hopes, dreams, family, lust; not handled perfectly, but a very admirable and funny attempt.

The Tillman Story - Astonishing! And as with the three other documentaries below, astonishing that despite 24/7 'news' on multiple channels, that so few stories get treated in greater depth after the sensationalism has run its course.

Restrepo - hard to watch. Poor everybody involved. It has stayed with me, resonating over and over.

Inside Job - because “the system” is run by crooks and Mainstream Media doesn’t even hint at the truth. Michael Moore, take some notes here, this shit isn’t funny.

Gasland - really? they're going to industrialize the entire Delaware River Valley for an expendable fossil fuel that'll last a decade tops? this film draws attention to a very important issue.

Films specifically NOT mentioned above:

True Grit - so now violence isn’t what's funny, it’s what's moral? or what? the Coen brothers are so over-rated it’s ridiculous; the stilted lack of contractions is like some joke on the audience (the whole story is told from the girl/spinster’s point of view? but we’re only let in on that at the end? and if not, then the brothers are actually morons); content matters, if I never see another Western or Mobster or Serial Killer or Boxing or Ballet or Coen Brothers flick, it’ll be too soon.

Blue Valentine - Michelle Williams is awesome, but the PA license plates on the front of cars, and Ryan Gosling, are unforgivably annoying.

Black Swan - premise, annoying; Natalie Portman’s character, annoying; psychosexual ballet movie, annoying; content matters.

And now, as if anybody cares what Pisserati thinks, here are some other categories.

Best Actor: James Franco for 127 Hours (and year-long achievement award)
Best Actress: Nicole Kidman for Rabbit Hole (though it’s a photo finish with Annette Benning and Michelle Williams and Tilda Swinton).
Best Director: David Fincher for the Social Network
Best Supporting Actor: Christian Bale for The Fighter (though Mark Ruffalo is a very close 2nd).
Best Feature Animation: Toy Story 3
Documentary Feature: Very strong entries all, but I can't pick this category as it'll just get me in trouble.
Best Supporting Actress: Melissa Leo for The Fighter
Best Animated Short: Madagascar (though Lets Polute is a close second).
Best Live Action Short: The Confession
Best Documentary Short: Sun Come Up.
Best Screenplay (Adapted): The Social Network
Best Screenplay (Original): The Kids Are Alright
Best Picture: Rabbit Hole, but since that's not nominated, The Kids Are Alright is the highest of the Oscar nominees (3rd on my list), but I’d be okay with The Social Network (4th on my list) or even The King’s Speech (honorable mention). If either True Grit or Black Swan gets it, yuck.

Disclaimers: These are not predictions of who will win an Oscar. What I predict is that the Academy will probably get it wrong, as they have done so often (No Country For Old Men, The (are you kidding me?) Departed, Crash), failing to even nominate Rabbit Hole for best picture. Also note that this list is subject to change, as I still haven't seen Another Year, Somewhere, or Get Low. And of course, all of this is IMHO. Yeah, right, as if I ever had one of those. :)

Tuesday, September 28, 2010

PA Homeland Security monitored Environmentalists -- Are they still doing it?

The Pennsylvania Senate is holding hearings into why PA Homeland Security spied on anti-gas-drilling environmental groups and individual citizens and then shared the information with the gas industry and pro-drilling groups in "terror bulletins."

So next time you wonder why our government doesn't do more to protect the environment, there's your answer. It's because our government is "of the corporations, by the corporations, and for the corporations."

And you can bet that a Tea Party takeover on November 2nd will only make it worse.

Thursday, September 16, 2010

Clinton Surplus, Bush Deficit -- Where was the TEA PARTY THEN?

There is just ONE question to keep asking over and over again between now and election day on November 2nd. Where were all these TEA PARTY people when George W. Bush was turning Bill Clinton’s $236 billion budget SURPLUS into a $1.3 trillion DEFICIT? WHERE WERE THEY THEN? WHERE?

That’s right, on Bill Clinton’s last day in office, there was a budget surplus of 236 billion dollars. And on George W. Bush’s last in office, there was a deficit of 1.3 trillion dollars.

Furthermore, when Bill Clinton left office the 10-year federal budget projection was for a $5.6 trillion SURPLUS. And when George W. Bush left office, the 10-year projection for the federal budget was a $8 trillion DEFICIT.

Hello. TEA PARTY NUT CASES! Hello! This is EARTH calling. WHERE WERE YOU THEN???????

Friday, September 10, 2010

To burn or not to burn the Koran?

That is the question!
apparently...
and what a hot little question…
a license for zealots...
to hit every street corner…
with the religious equivalent of road rage…
no matter the outcome of the proposed street theater…
lets honk our horns at that religion over there!
it’s trying to cut in line!
lets seethe…
lets turn the world into one big f*cking religious traffic jam…
lets imagine ramming into all those people that we really really hate…
like bumping cars…
now get out your lighters…
and lets start burning!

but can we stop with the Q’uran?
lets burn EVERY religious book that was ever invoked to start a war…
or rationalize an invasion…
or justify an act of terror…
or promote intolerance…
or serve as the backbone of an empire…
or bless an occupation…
or bolster a colonial system…
or help sustain oppression.

now we can start a serious bonfire…
really generate some light...
with the Old and New Testaments…
the Torah and Bahagavad Gita…
the I-Ching and the Upanishads…
the Tao Te Ching and the Book of the Dead…
the Vedas and the Pentateuch…
the Analects and the Kojiki…
the Diamond Sutra and Dianetics...
surely they've all been used…
at one time or another to do something bad…
OH C’mon, more like…
LOTS OF REALLY HORRIBLE THINGS…
but burning the books won’t be enough,
we’ll have to torch all the churches and temples and mosques and shrines…
and monasteries and pagodas and convents and madrasses…
and cathedrals and stupas and meeting houses and basilicas too…
any building that ever was or could be used to house any kind of religious text…
so no more problem with that Mosque in downtown Manhattan …
no sense in building it at all if it’s just going to get burnt down later…

still, this does not seem enough…
we probably need to burn every religious person just to be safe…
anybody who might remember what was in any of those books we just burned…
cause lets face it…
if they can remember what was in the books…
then they’re going to write it all down again…
and so we’ll probably have to burn all the believers too,
anybody who even read any of those religious texts …
because any one of them could become the source for re-publishing all that filth…

but maybe religious books are not the only culprit…
most books have probably been used in some way to cause some kind of suffering…
no matter the subject…
COOKBOOKS for example…
they’ve probably led to murders…
because, you know, they suggest the use of knives to cut things up…
but any knife that will cut up an onion or potato can also slice up a human…
which gets you to wondering…
which cookbooks in particular led to the more famous serial killers?

so we’re probably going to have to set all the libraries ablaze…
and burn all the writers too…
and anybody who has ever read anything written by any of those writers…
because any one of them could suddenly write it all down again…
words that will get used by somebody to rationalize some act of violence or cruelty…

and so it seems, finally…
that we’re going to have no choice but to burn billions of people…
everybody except the illiterate apparently…
and the only efficient way to do that…
is going to be an all-out nuclear holocaust!

so lets pit Pakistan against India…
Israel against Iran…
North Korea against South Korea…
China against Japan…
Russia against the U.S…
and who knows, maybe we can even get France and England dueling again...
and then we’ll go to the United Nations and start hurling insults at each other…
you know, way below the belt stuff…
like “your mother wears army boots” and “your father smells of elderberries”…
and then we’ll all push all of our big red buttons all at the same time…

and then there’ll be nothing more to argue about!

God… or whatever name you want to apply…
will be back at the helm...
completely…
without any questioning…
and without any heretics…

Saturday, March 13, 2010

Please Note

If you are looking for the Bush era polemics previously published on this blog, sorry, but they've been permanently deleted and Pisserati has moved on to new adventures.